🔗 Share this article

When I am a DM, I historically shied away from extensive use of luck during my D&D adventures. I preferred was for story direction and session development to be guided by player choice rather than random chance. Recently, I opted to change my approach, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Seeing 'Luck Rolls'

A popular podcast utilizes a DM who regularly requests "fate rolls" from the participants. This involves choosing a specific dice and defining consequences tied to the result. This is essentially no distinct from using a random table, these are created in the moment when a player's action doesn't have a predetermined outcome.

I opted to test this technique at my own session, mostly because it appeared engaging and provided a departure from my standard routine. The outcome were eye-opening, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated dynamic between preparation and improvisation in a roleplaying game.

A Powerful In-Game Example

In a recent session, my group had just emerged from a city-wide battle. Later, a player asked about two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had survived. In place of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, a single one would die; on a 10+, they both lived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a deeply poignant moment where the party discovered the corpses of their friends, still holding hands in death. The cleric held last rites, which was particularly powerful due to earlier story developments. As a parting touch, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were miraculously restored, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. I randomized, the bead's magical effect was exactly what the party lacked to resolve another critical story problem. One just plan this type of serendipitous moments.

Improving Your Improvisation

This event led me to ponder if improvisation and spontaneity are actually the beating heart of D&D. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Groups often excel at ignoring the best constructed narratives. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to think quickly and create content on the fly.

Using similar mechanics is a excellent way to develop these abilities without venturing too far outside your usual style. The key is to deploy them for minor situations that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. For instance, I wouldn't use it to determine if the main villain is a traitor. However, I would consider using it to figure out whether the PCs enter a room just in time to see a key action unfolds.

Enhancing Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also helps make players feel invested and create the sensation that the adventure is alive, evolving based on their decisions as they play. It combats the feeling that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole narrative, thereby enhancing the cooperative aspect of the game.

This philosophy has historically been part of the original design. The game's roots were reliant on charts, which made sense for a playstyle focused on exploration. Even though current D&D often emphasizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, that may not be the only path.

Finding the Sweet Spot

There is absolutely no issue with thorough preparation. However, there is also nothing wrong with relinquishing control and letting the dice to guide minor details in place of you. Control is a significant aspect of a DM's responsibilities. We need it to run the game, yet we frequently find it hard to release it, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

The core suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of letting go of your plan. Try a little randomness for inconsequential outcomes. You might just discover that the surprising result is infinitely more powerful than anything you would have planned in advance.